Dental Implants Local
Chapter 01 • Question 6

What Are All-on-6 Dental Implants?

📺 6:30 video📖 17 min read
Dr Tim Fleming
Reviewed by Dr Tim Fleming
BDS – Dental Surgeon (GDC Reg: 83324)

All-on-6 is a dental implant technique that replaces an entire arch of teeth using six strategically placed implants rather than the four used in All-on-4. While the core concept is similar—providing a full set of fixed teeth supported by multiple implants—the additional two implants offer increased stability and may be recommended in specific situations.

This article explains how All-on-6 works, how it differs from All-on-4, the advantages of using six implants instead of four, and which patients benefit most from this approach.

Quick Reference

AspectAll-on-6 Details
Number of Implants6 per arch (upper or lower)
Number of Teeth Replaced10-14 teeth per arch
Typical TimelineSame day to 6 months
UK Cost Per Arch£10,000-£18,000
Success Rate96-99% over 10 years

Understanding All-on-6

All-on-6 follows the same fundamental principle as All-on-4 but uses six implants instead of four to support a full arch of replacement teeth.

The Basic Configuration

A typical All-on-6 arrangement includes:

  • Two implants at the front of the jaw (similar to All-on-4)
  • Four implants in the middle and back regions (two more than All-on-4)
  • A custom bridge attached to all six implants

The six implants work together to distribute chewing forces across a wider area, providing enhanced stability and support.

Development of All-on-6

While All-on-4 was designed as the minimum number of implants needed for full-arch restoration, clinical experience showed that adding two more implants in the middle region:

  • Improved force distribution
  • Increased long-term success rates
  • Provided backup if one implant develops problems
  • Better suited certain anatomical situations

All-on-6 emerged as a refinement for patients with adequate bone or those wanting maximum stability.

How All-on-6 Differs from All-on-4

Understanding the key differences helps explain when six implants are worth the additional investment.

Implant Placement Pattern

All-on-4:

  • Two front implants placed vertically
  • Two back implants angled at 30-45 degrees
  • Implants positioned at the front and far back only

All-on-6:

  • Two front implants placed vertically
  • Two middle implants placed vertically or slightly angled
  • Two back implants angled (often less severely than All-on-4)
  • Implants distributed more evenly across the arch

Force Distribution

All-on-4:

  • Four implants support entire arch
  • Each implant bears approximately 25% of chewing forces
  • Back implants experience higher stress due to angling

All-on-6:

  • Six implants support entire arch
  • Each implant bears approximately 16% of chewing forces
  • More even force distribution
  • Reduced stress on individual implants

Bone Requirements

All-on-4:

  • Designed to work with minimal bone
  • Angled back implants avoid anatomical structures
  • Often possible without bone grafting

All-on-6:

  • Requires more available bone
  • Additional middle implants need adequate vertical space
  • May require bone grafting more frequently
  • Not always possible in severely resorbed jaws

Cost Comparison

All-on-4:

  • £8,000-£15,000 per arch
  • Four implants included
  • Standard treatment approach

All-on-6:

  • £10,000-£18,000 per arch
  • Six implants included
  • Additional £2,000-3,000 for extra implants
  • More complex bridge fabrication

Advantages of All-on-6

The additional two implants provide several benefits that may justify the extra cost.

Enhanced Stability

  • Better resistance to lateral forces
  • Improved stability for immediate loading
  • Less micromovement during healing
  • More secure feeling for patient

Superior Force Distribution

  • Each implant experiences less stress (16% vs 25%)
  • Reduced risk of individual implant overload
  • Lower mechanical complication rate
  • Potentially longer implant lifespan

Redundancy and Backup

  • If one implant develops problems, five remain
  • Bridge can continue functioning with five implants
  • Less catastrophic if early failure occurs

Higher Success Rates

  • All-on-4: 94-96% success at 10 years
  • All-on-6: 96-99% success at 10 years
  • 2-3% improvement for maximum predictability

Dentists typically recommend six implants over four in specific situations.

Patient Factors

  • Strong bite force: Heavy chewers, strong jaw muscles, history of breaking dental work
  • Higher BMI: Increased body weight correlates with higher bite forces
  • Bruxism: Teeth grinding creates increased forces even with night guard
  • Active lifestyle: Athletes, people who talk extensively, maximum confidence needed

Anatomical Factors

  • Adequate bone available: Sufficient width and height for six implants
  • Wide arch: Naturally wider jaws benefit from more distribution points
  • Uneven bone quality: Variable density compensated by additional implants

The All-on-6 Procedure

The treatment process is similar to All-on-4 but involves placing two additional implants.

Initial Assessment

  • CT scan to assess bone at six sites
  • More complex digital planning
  • Verification adequate bone exists

Surgical Procedure

  • Takes 2.5-4 hours (vs 2-3 for All-on-4)
  • Six implants placed instead of four
  • Immediate loading often possible
  • Generally more stable than All-on-4

All-on-6 vs All-on-4: Making the Decision

Choose All-on-4 When:

  • ✓ Bone is limited
  • ✓ Budget is primary concern
  • ✓ Bone grafting must be avoided
  • ✓ Lighter bite force
  • ✓ Standard success rate acceptable

Choose All-on-6 When:

  • ✓ Adequate bone available
  • ✓ Budget allows optimal treatment
  • ✓ Heavy chewer/strong bite
  • ✓ Maximum stability desired
  • ✓ History of bruxism
  • ✓ Highest success rate wanted

The additional cost of All-on-6 (£2,000-3,000 more per arch) buys 2-3% improved success rate, better force distribution, and peace of mind from redundancy.

Maintenance Requirements

All-on-6 maintenance is similar to All-on-4:

  • Daily cleaning: 15-20 minutes with water flosser and interdental brushes
  • Professional check-ups every 3-4 months
  • Annual cost: £300-500 for maintenance
  • Bridge replacement every 10-15 years

Success Rates and Complications

Short-Term (1 Year)

  • Immediate loading: 97-99%
  • Delayed loading: 99%+

Long-Term (10+ Years)

  • Overall: 96-99% still functioning
  • Lower jaw: 97-99%
  • Upper jaw: 95-98%

Cost Breakdown

Typical All-on-6 Package (Per Arch)

  • Comprehensive examination and CT scan
  • Digital planning with six implants
  • Extraction of remaining teeth
  • Placement of six implants
  • Temporary bridge (if immediate loading)
  • Final custom bridge
  • First year follow-ups

Total: £10,000-£18,000

Cost Comparison Table

ComponentAll-on-4All-on-6
Base treatment£8,000-£15,000£10,000-£18,000
Per implant cost£2,000-£3,750£1,667-£3,000
Difference-+£2,000-£3,000

All-on-6 vs Other Full-Arch Options

All-on-6 vs All-on-8

All-on-8:

  • 8 implants per arch
  • Cost: £15,000-25,000
  • Highest stability
  • Requires excellent bone

All-on-6:

  • More economical
  • Excellent stability
  • Better cost-benefit ratio
  • Suitable for more patients

Conclusion

All-on-6 dental implants represent a middle ground between the economical All-on-4 approach and the more extensive option of individual implants for each tooth. Using six strategically placed implants to support a full arch, All-on-6 offers enhanced stability, better force distribution, and higher long-term success rates (96-99%).

While it costs £2,000-3,000 more per arch than All-on-4, this represents only a 15-20% increase in cost for measurably better outcomes. For patients who have adequate bone, can afford the difference, and want maximum stability, All-on-6 represents an excellent option.

The decision between All-on-4 and All-on-6 should be made in consultation with an experienced implant dentist who can assess individual bone quality, bite force, and personal needs to recommend the most appropriate option.

Key Takeaways

  • All-on-6 uses 6 implants per arch instead of 4 for full arch restoration
  • Provides better force distribution with each implant bearing ~16% vs 25% of forces
  • Success rate of 96-99% over 10 years, slightly better than All-on-4
  • Costs £10,000-£18,000 per arch (£2,000-3,000 more than All-on-4)
  • Recommended for heavy chewers, bruxism, or when maximum stability desired
  • Requires more available bone than All-on-4
  • Provides redundancy—if one implant fails, five remain to support bridge
  • Best for patients wanting optimal outcomes and who have adequate bone

Related Questions You Might Have

Ready to Learn More?

Download our complete guide covering all 117 questions about dental implants in the UK

Find a Dental Implant Clinic

Search by location or practice name to compare clinics near you

Popular: