Dental Implants Local
Chapter 01 โ€ข Question 7

What Are Zygomatic Dental Implants?

๐Ÿ“บ 5:30 video๐Ÿ“– 11 min read
Dr Tim Fleming
Reviewed by Dr Tim Fleming
BDS โ€“ Dental Surgeon (GDC Reg: 83324)

Zygomatic dental implants represent a specialized solution for patients who have experienced severe bone loss in the upper jaw and cannot receive conventional dental implants. While traditional implants anchor into the jawbone, zygomatic implants take a different approach by anchoring into the cheekbone (zygoma), which is denser and more resistant to resorption.

This advanced technique offers hope to patients who might otherwise require extensive bone grafting procedures or be told that implants aren't an option. However, zygomatic implants require significant surgical expertise and aren't appropriate for everyone.

Understanding the Zygomatic Bone

The zygomatic bone, commonly known as the cheekbone, is one of the strongest bones in the facial skeleton. Unlike the maxilla (upper jawbone), which can deteriorate significantly after tooth loss, the zygomatic bone maintains its density and structure even when teeth have been missing for many years.

This stability makes the zygoma an ideal anchor point when the upper jawbone lacks sufficient volume to support conventional implants. The bone's density and resistance to resorption mean that zygomatic implants can provide secure, long-lasting support for dental restorations.

Why the Zygomatic Bone is Ideal:

  • Maintains density even after years of tooth loss
  • Resistant to resorption (bone loss)
  • One of the strongest facial bones
  • Stable anchor point for long implants

How Zygomatic Implants Differ from Conventional Implants

Conventional Implants:

  • Length: 10-15mm
  • Placed vertically into jawbone
  • Anchor directly beneath tooth position
  • Require adequate bone in specific location

Zygomatic Implants:

  • Length: 30-52.5mm
  • Angled through upper jaw
  • Anchor in cheekbone (zygoma)
  • Bypass areas of bone loss

Typically, one zygomatic implant is placed on each side of the upper jaw, often in combination with two to four conventional implants in the front of the mouth where bone is usually better preserved.

Zygomatic implants are typically considered when patients face one or more of these situations:

Severe Upper Jawbone Loss

Makes conventional implants impossible without extensive grafting. Commonly occurs in:

  • Patients who have worn dentures for many years
  • Advanced periodontal disease cases
  • Significant bone resorption

Failed Bone Graft Procedures

Previous attempts to rebuild the jawbone haven't provided adequate bone. Some patients undergo multiple grafting procedures over several years, only to find the grafts don't integrate or maintain adequate volume.

Medical Conditions Preventing Grafting

  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Osteoporosis
  • Radiation therapy requirements
  • Bisphosphonate medications

Desire to Avoid Bone Grafting

Major bone grafting in the upper jaw often requires harvesting bone from the hip or using synthetic materials, followed by 6-12 months of healing before implants can be placed. Zygomatic implants can eliminate this lengthy process.

Sinus Complications

Previous procedures or anatomical variations that make sinus lift procedures high-risk or impossible.

The Zygomatic Implant Procedure

Zygomatic implant surgery is significantly more complex than conventional implant placement and requires a surgeon with specialized training. The procedure is typically performed under general anesthesia or deep sedation in a hospital or surgical center setting.

Surgical Process

  • Implants inserted at precise angle through upper jaw into zygomatic bone
  • Advanced 3D imaging and surgical guides used for planning
  • Avoids sensitive structures like nerves and sinus cavities
  • Angle and length customized based on patient anatomy

Common Approaches

  • Quad zygoma: Four zygomatic implants
  • Hybrid approach: Two zygomatic + two to four conventional front implants
  • Combination provides optimal support and stability

Immediate Loading Advantage

Zygomatic implants can often be loaded immediately or within a few days. Patients can leave with fixed, functional teeth rather than waiting months for healing as required with bone grafting.

Recovery and Healing

Recovery from zygomatic implant surgery is typically more involved than conventional implant placement. Patients commonly experience:

Swelling and Bruising

Around cheeks and under eyes. Normal due to proximity to cheekbones. Peaks at 48-72 hours, resolves over 7-10 days.

Sinus Congestion

Minor nosebleeds for a few days. Surgery involves working near maxillary sinuses. Temporary and resolves as sinuses heal.

Discomfort and Pain

Well-controlled with prescribed medication. Most patients report recovery is less uncomfortable than major bone grafting.

Dietary Restrictions

Soft foods for first few weeks while surgical sites heal and temporary prosthesis is adjusted.

Timeline

  • Return to work: 7-14 days
  • Complete healing: 3-6 months
  • Temporary prosthesis worn during healing
  • Final restoration placed after full integration

Success Rates and Long-Term Outcomes

Studies show that zygomatic implants have high success rates when placed by experienced surgeons. Research indicates success rates of 95-98% over 5-10 years, comparable to conventional implants in healthy bone.

Success Rate: 95-98% Over 5-10 Years

Outcomes are highly dependent on:

  • Surgeon expertise: Should only be placed by specialists with specific training
  • Patient selection: Not every patient with bone loss is appropriate
  • Proper maintenance: Excellent oral hygiene and regular monitoring required

Potential Complications

While generally successful, zygomatic implants do carry some specific risks:

Sinusitis

Can occur if implant penetrates sinus membrane or bacteria enter during/after surgery. Most cases resolve with antibiotics.

Sensory Changes

In upper lip, cheek, or around nose if nerves affected. Usually temporary but occasionally permanent.

Implant Mobility or Failure

Rare when placed by experienced surgeons. Can occur if implant doesn't integrate properly or excessive force applied too early.

Infection

As with any surgical procedure. Rates relatively low with proper antibiotic protocols and post-operative care.

Cost Considerations

Zygomatic implants are significantly more expensive than conventional implants due to several factors:

  • Requires highly specialized surgeon with advanced training
  • Surgery more complex and time-consuming (2-4 hours)
  • Performed in hospital or surgical center under general anesthesia
  • Implants longer and more expensive than conventional

UK Costs

ยฃ15,000 to ยฃ30,000 per arch

Typically includes:

  • Surgery and implants
  • Anesthesia
  • Temporary prosthesis
  • Final restoration may be quoted separately

Cost Comparison: Zygomatic vs Grafting + Conventional

Multiple bone grafting procedures: ยฃ5,000-ยฃ15,000 + 6-12 months healing

Plus conventional implants: ยฃ8,000-ยฃ20,000

When factoring in time saved and avoiding additional surgeries, zygomatic implants can be cost-competitive

Comparing to Alternative Options

For patients with severe upper jaw bone loss, the alternatives to zygomatic implants include:

Major Bone Grafting

  • Uses bone from hip or synthetic materials
  • Requires multiple surgeries
  • 6-12 months healing time
  • Risk of graft failure
  • Not suitable for all patients

Traditional Removable Dentures

  • Poor retention with severe bone loss
  • Difficulty eating
  • Impact on quality of life
  • Many patients find unsatisfactory

All-on-4 with Short Implants

  • Possible in some cases
  • Requires minimal bone in front
  • May not provide adequate long-term stability
  • Not suitable for severe resorption

Ideal Candidates

The ideal candidate for zygomatic implants:

โœ“ Good Candidates

  • Severe bone loss in upper jaw
  • Good general health
  • Realistic expectations
  • Committed to oral hygiene
  • Non-smoker or willing to quit
  • Adequate zygomatic bone density

โœ— Poor Candidates

  • Insufficient zygomatic bone
  • Uncontrolled medical conditions
  • Active smokers unwilling to quit
  • Poor oral hygiene habits
  • Unrealistic expectations

Conclusion

Zygomatic dental implants represent an advanced solution for patients with severe upper jaw bone loss who cannot receive conventional implants. By anchoring into the dense, stable cheekbone rather than the atrophied maxilla, these specialized implants offer hope to patients who might otherwise face years of wearing dentures or undergoing multiple failed bone grafting procedures.

The technique requires significant surgical expertise, typically involves more extensive recovery than conventional implants, and comes with higher costs (ยฃ15,000-ยฃ30,000 per arch). However, for appropriate candidates, zygomatic implants offer several compelling advantages:

  • Eliminates the need for extensive bone grafting and lengthy waiting periods
  • Often allows immediate or early loading with functional teeth
  • Provides stable, long-term support with 95-98% success rates
  • Offers a viable alternative when other options have failed

Not every patient with bone loss is an appropriate candidate, and the procedure should only be performed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons or periodontists with specific training in this technique. However, for patients who meet the criteria and are treated by experienced specialists, zygomatic implants can be life-changing, restoring not just dental function but also confidence and quality of life.

โœ“ Key Takeaways

  • โœ“Zygomatic implants anchor in the cheekbone rather than jawbone for severe bone loss
  • โœ“Much longer than conventional implants (30-52.5mm) and placed at an angle
  • โœ“Requires specialized surgeon and more complex procedure than conventional placement
  • โœ“Success rates of 95-98% over 5-10 years when placed by experienced surgeons
  • โœ“Immediate or early loading often possible, avoiding lengthy waiting periods
  • โœ“Recovery more involved than conventional implants but less than major bone grafting
  • โœ“Cost: ยฃ15,000-ยฃ30,000 per arch but may be comparable to multiple grafting procedures
  • โœ“Not suitable for everyone; requires careful evaluation and patient selection
  • โœ“Offers viable alternative to years of dentures or repeated failed bone grafts

Related Questions You Might Have

Ready to Learn More?

Download our complete guide covering all 117 questions about dental implants in the UK

Find a Dental Implant Clinic

Search by location or practice name to compare clinics near you

Popular: